In his influential writings on urbanism, Rem Koolhaas’ rhetoric brings to mind that of Shakespeare’s Mark Antony: he is here to bury the city, not to praise it. And his words have worked well. Koolhaas’ insights have lent the world new sharpness and compelled us to choose sides. Like the crowd before Antony, the profession has been swayed. Yet, for all his eloquence, Koolhaas seldom offers counsel. Only in few cases does he offer strategies for managing or improving the conditions he identifies and describes. Amoral and pragmatic, he dismisses concerns for collective good and derides nostalgia. His words draw out battle lines, identify new alliances and spread new hope for what will be when we find ourselves at peace with our urban world. But do they offer a program? I would argue so. For, on beyond the seductive allure of Koolhaas’ arguments, it is possible to discern the programs that they imply - both those which Koolhaas himself continues to pursue, as well as other, possibly more powerful projects that he may have left behind. (more…)